Tuesday, 18 February 2014

A Weak Shilling for Our Benefit



I am sitted in some café with dad having some croissant and cappuccino for breakfast when I see currencies’ exchange rates on the TV on business news. Partly motivated by a biiiig International Finance document I have been reading, I hunch over my iPad and compose this write-up. The Kenyan shilling has been depreciating against the dollar overtime. I grew up a young boy, seen the dollar sell at around 36bob, (CBK website says it was trading at US$1/36.23Ksh in Jan 1993). I have also seen this rate hit an all-times high of Ksh105.75/US$ (Oct2011), and now stabilized at around US$1/86Ksh.

There are several explanations for currency depreciation. First, the persistent rise in prices-inflation (explained by the theory of purchasing power parity). Second, the National Trade Deficit (imports exceeds exports). As the trade deficit increases, the value of a country’s currency depreciate against the currency of the countries it is trading with. Third, the Monetary policy- (economic money supply). The Central Bank adjusts monetary policy in order to find equilibrium between the supply and demand by either printing more money or selling government owned securities.

Economists Ben Bernanke, Arthur Laffer, Dr. Aballa or me will tell you that currency depreciation is not necessarily a bad thing for an economy/country.

A weakening shilling…

Depreciation of a currency makes a country’s exports cheaper (theory of purchasing power parity) and therefore more competitive in the international markets (price leadership). Remember when the shilling hit a past US$1/105.75Ksh mark? Kenya has had currency depreciation that would have been good for the economy, swiftly, greatly, tremendously and absolutely!

But why were/are we not on the streets dancing?

A check on our Capital and Current Accounts (BOP) shows a deficit. Kenya brings in more goods than we export thus a weak shilling leaves our county’s wealth worse off, that’s why we are not in the streets dancing as the shilling depreciates even more.

More exports are good for a country. They not only improve the balance of payments-(BOP) but also increase the country’s economic wellbeing. A growing economy (due to more exports) coupled with good re-distribution policies should be good for all. Indeed, good to even the unemployed like me as well.

But can our good taxation system or fair redistribution policies change our current situation? No, I won’t bet.

Even if there was a surge in demand for our Kenyan exports in the international markets, we are limited on how much we can supply within a given time. We have limited capital and inputs to expand production. Land too is limited.

The benefits derivable from currency depreciation are complicated by the fact that we are net importers! 

Worse still, most of what we import consists of basic capital equipment, and other basics like food items. Can we really do without imports? The answer is NO. No man is an island. Therefore, given the depreciating shilling and the basic necessity to import; all of us are inevitably hurt due to high import prices, which should not be the case.

But we still got a way out!

The solution to the pun above would be to address supply constraints within the economy. Kenya can produce. Kenya can value-add her local products. Kenya can manufacture some products she has been importing. Kenya can export too. Kenya can make her BOP positive. Kenya can ensure increased and sustained supply capacity, competitive domestic pricing as well as increased capacity to meet surges in demand within and without the international markets.

And for this to work, there should be a reasonable openness in the economy and political policies, a relatively floating exchange rate, credit and a reduced risks of investments.

Let me resume my croissant, with the already cold cappuccino.